The Memoir - a work in progress
Background see Working on a Memoir
1st leaf see Memoir Leaf 1 - Mexico 2008
Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, CambodiaLeaves 7-9 Hooning, Teaching & Presenting
Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career
Leaves 12-14 Car crash, Launceston early 1960s, A Road Not Taken
Leaf 15 “Hey Ma look it’s Jimmy Carter”
Accra Ghana March 2010
In early
March 2010, I stood at a conference lectern in Accra, Ghana, in front of
representatives from over 20 African countries. I was there at the invitation
of the Carter Centre. Seated smiling in
the front row was former US President Jimmy Carter showing, in the deep lines
of his face, every one of his many years. Jimmy Carter, after his single term
presidency, had set up the Carter Centre, an organisation devoted to work on
development projects. He had just given
a spirited talk that in some areas was strongly contrary to the points I
intended to make.
My topic was “The difficulties facing African
countries in trying to implement freedom of information legislation”. Unlike
most of the participants: activists, journalists, parliamentarians, professional
staff of non-government organisations and Jimmy Carter, my task was not to
focus on, and advocate for, the positives of transparency and FOI legislation. Instead,
my mission was to draw attention to many of the problems African countries
would face in trying to achieve effective access to information schemes. Until
recently, 95% or more of the law reform effort and resources has gone into
encouraging countries to adopt FOI legislation. With over 90 countries adopting
some form of legislation, this has been a very successful uptake of a law
reform initiative.
Yet the really difficult task of implementation, especially for post-conflict countries or those faced with crippling combinations of high level corruption, overwhelmed public services and non-existent records management capacity – most African countries - received little or no attention and resources.
Yet the really difficult task of implementation, especially for post-conflict countries or those faced with crippling combinations of high level corruption, overwhelmed public services and non-existent records management capacity – most African countries - received little or no attention and resources.
This
was the second time I had been in close proximity to President Carter. The previous
year I had visited Atlanta, Georgia for a Carter Centre conference. In the
Atlanta group photo I was in the back row of the 125 delegates: the only
academic in the line up of Presidents, activists, parliamentarians and
representatives of institutions like the World Bank.
This
time, there was no one between President Carter and me.
As I talked he appeared to listen intently. While at times he nodded at my words, at others, he looked a little discomforted as I took a line that strongly contradicted some of the points he had made. His talk had been a more traditional set piece selling the democratic, good governance and development virtues of FOI. A thousand different thoughts bumped into each other in my mind as I spoke. While trying to focus on my talk and the whole audience I found it difficult not to try and catch, and gauge, the reaction of the “Former Leader of the Free World,” a refreshing and liberal antidote to the dark years of Richard Nixon and the insipidness of Gerald Ford. I remembered my university days of studying political science and watching the Carter Presidency attempt to steer the US towards a foreign policy agenda that focused on partnerships, human rights and global development. And there was a little bit of me marvelling that a four-eyed, stuttering geek in a small primary school classroom, on the western edge of a small island, who spent his time looking out on the bare hills of Queenstown would one day find himself delivering a speech in a major African country before a former President of the United States.
As I talked he appeared to listen intently. While at times he nodded at my words, at others, he looked a little discomforted as I took a line that strongly contradicted some of the points he had made. His talk had been a more traditional set piece selling the democratic, good governance and development virtues of FOI. A thousand different thoughts bumped into each other in my mind as I spoke. While trying to focus on my talk and the whole audience I found it difficult not to try and catch, and gauge, the reaction of the “Former Leader of the Free World,” a refreshing and liberal antidote to the dark years of Richard Nixon and the insipidness of Gerald Ford. I remembered my university days of studying political science and watching the Carter Presidency attempt to steer the US towards a foreign policy agenda that focused on partnerships, human rights and global development. And there was a little bit of me marvelling that a four-eyed, stuttering geek in a small primary school classroom, on the western edge of a small island, who spent his time looking out on the bare hills of Queenstown would one day find himself delivering a speech in a major African country before a former President of the United States.
Next
morning, I shared breakfast with the then Ugandan Minister for Information, Princess Kabakumba Labwoni Masiko, and an investigative
journalist from Uganda. A spirited conversation ensued between the two Ugandans
that was both intriguing and fascinating for an Aussie academic. I thought of
the recent and history of Uganda, where simply to be a journalist was a death
sentence, let alone pressing the Information Minister on press freedom issues
and allegations of corruption by those in her government over shared jam and
toast in the presence of a foreigner.
Ironically,
in December 2011 Princess
Kabakumba Labwoni Masiko resigned from her position in the Ugandan Cabinet following allegations of abuse of office, theft by taking, causing monetary loss to the government
and conspiracy to defraud government. Radio broadcasting equipment was alleged to
have been stolen from the Ministry of Information when she was Minister and
subsequently used in a regional radio station she had a 75% interest in.
During
the first six months of 2010 in the midst of my busiest teaching schedule (two
classes with a total of 500+ students) I travelled to Botswana, South Africa,
Ghana, Malaysia, US, Canada, Fiji, New Zealand, three times to the UK and a
brief stopover in the transit area of Cario’s international airport. A Saturday
morning might find me up early to set up my stall at Salamanca Market and the
next Saturday I was on the savannah of Botswana petting semi-tamed cheetahs. A
Monday morning would find me lecturing to 300 eager young first year law
students on judges and juries and later that week I would find myself being
picked up by Her Majesty’s Foreign Office to be whisked off to Wilton Park, an
isolated conference facility in the English countryside designed for ‘quiet and
discrete dialogues’. In June I was criss-crossing Canada while trying to cobble
together an application for promotion to Associate Professor.
All of
these trips and encounters, no matter how fleeting, with power and position and
the sharp contrasts with life outside the conference walls and restricted
venues, shape my teaching. I find it impossible to even think about returning
to the classroom to confront my students with a pile of inert and dead material
for them to regurgitate back in an exam. I want them to have journeys like mine
or, at the very least, intellectual journeys. I want them to be able to engage with
former Presidents or current Ministers, or wild and passionate Filipinas who
want to make a difference if the opportunity presents. I don’t want to burden
them with law presented as a series of burdensome, archaic and rigid formula
that just leads to a yes/no answer that no one appears interested in.
Leaf 16 “The boys are in Hobart Town –
where the f**k is Lenah Valley?” Hobart
November 1974
Dickie
and I came out of that classic car chase movie Dirty Mary and Crazy Larry super-hyped. We were at the cinema located
near The Mercury Building in Hobart:
an ultimate thrill for a pair of Queenstown boys who had recently finished
Grade 10. We lived near each other for several years sharing wild adventures in
the hills surrounding Queenstown and playing against each other in several
sports. He was the better football player and I was a superior cricketer and we
were roughly even on the badminton court though he had a slight edge. Dickie
was in Hobart because he was pursuing a possible football career. On the field
he was a fast, nimble and talented red-haired rover with a terrier like
attitude. His father had driven us from Queenstown, in between his work shifts
at the mine, but he couldn’t stay, leaving us to catch a bus home. His reasoning
was that two, sixteen year old Queenstown boys alone in Hobart were a safer bet
than one.
I had tagged
along to investigate going to college. We
had the wild idea of sharing a house. In those days, we had no idea how
unlikely that scenario was or how unviable. We walked back from the movie to
our accommodation in Lenah Valley, the home of distant relatives of Dickie, I
think. During the next two hours the initial buzz from the movie drifted away
with each uncertain step towards Lenah Valley. Hobart with a population of
150,000 people was certainly no Queenstown, with just over several thousand
souls. Queenstown was a small town located in a narrow and long valley that we
could run from one end to the other in less than 20 minutes. In contrast, Hobart,
in the dark, simply seemed endless to us mountain boys. We were walking past
endless rows of, what to us seemed like, mansions. Back home there were only a
very small handful of substantial brick houses in the whole town. Here in
Hobart every house seemed bigger and more exotic than anything we had
encountered previously.
Dickie’s
football career didn’t materialise and I lost track of him after I moved south
the following February. I was offered a place in Hollydene Hostel – a place
brought to Dad’s attention by the owners of Dilger’s Garage in Queenstown, whose
sons had gone to Hollydene. As a former guesthouse next door to a hotel, it
appealed to a Queenie boy and helped offset the social disgrace of staying at
school when everyone else was raking in the money as apprentices in the mine.
It was a huge leap into the unknown because no one in the family had any
experience of moving away from home for education. It was my first warning of
how big and transforming that final departure from the valley would be.
After
my final year high school, only five students out of more than a hundred, from
three West Coast towns went onto college: two boys and three girls. Originally it was meant to be six of us
heading south. At the last moment Sooty, the son of the Mt Lyell General Store
manager, decided to take up an apprenticeship.
The problem of getting to Hobart almost derailed the whole adventure for
me before it started. Dad couldn’t get off work. The only option was the bus and then finding
my own way, with all my gear, between two unknown destinations - the bus station and Hollydene Hostel. My
plans rapidly started to shift towards applying for an apprenticeship. Options
for nearly all the girls in my class were far more limited. A few would become typists at the Mine
Offices, a smaller number shop assistants and for nearly all, an early marriage
before they were 18.
Fortunately,
a slightly older relative by marriage, working in Hobart was heading south and she
offered me a lift. This trip was one of the highlights of my young life. She
had long flowing hair, a bubbly personality and was driving a mini-moke: a young
boy’s dream girl in the mid 1970s. It was like a delayed arrival of Woodstock.
I still recall the wind roaring through the canvas flaps of the Mini Moke and
the two of us shouting to be heard over the noise as we cruised the 150 miles
through the wilderness and later farm lands (relatively new sights to this mountain
boy). She dropped me off at the front door of the hostel on Campbell Street.
The other new students mingling at the front, checking on arrivals, were a
little dumbstruck. Who was this West Coast boy pulling up in a mini-moke with a
beautiful young woman? I often think back, if the lift hadn’t materialised
would I have made the journey or simply opted to stay like Sooty, who still
lives in Queenstown and runs a large engineering works.
Within
two years it was only Leigh (another son of a local shop owner) and me left to
go onto university from the West Coast group. The total West Coast contingent
in the whole University were Leigh, the two Dilger boys, plus a couple of the
children of mine managers who had been sent away from Queenstown for their high
school education: not a great retention rate.
Two
factors played a big part in this abysmal retention rate: fear of the unknown;
and difficulty dealing with home sickness, or more accurately, losing
connection to our sense of place. For most West Coast parents, arranging for
their child’s further education, was beyond their experience in terms not only
of the mechanics but also in terms of emotional guidance and advice. Despite
forming friends at Hollydene Hostel, the Queenstown kids often didn’t go home
(a six hour bus ride) for weekends, while the kids from the Huon and East Coast
rarely stayed weekends. At weekends, we West Coasters faced the normal hostel
curfew and had little money to go out. I spent many a Friday and Saturday night
chatting on the phone to one of the West Coast girls who stayed at the girl’s
hostel up the road (our only chance to talk as the boys and girls at the
hostels went to different colleges). We chatted about what we had been reading,
movies seen, records played and hopes (often overly ambitious and rarely
realised) for the rest of the weekend.
When
we did go home it was to a very different lifestyle, one that was increasingly
difficult to adjust to and one that refused to accommodate who we were
becoming. The easiest thing to do when stepping off the bus was to shut down
the ‘Hobart’ persona and act out a paler version of the ‘Queenstowner’ who we
had been. Most of our school friends had jobs as apprentices or office staff at
the Mt Lyell Mining and Railway Co. They had it all: access to cars, booze and
girls. No time for long chats in a phone
booth or to read novels by authors with strange names. When I was in high
school it was difficult to get a girl friend because from about Year 8 onwards
you were competing with the 1st and 2nd year apprentices
who had access to cars, parties, money and their own houses.
At
first the infrequent trips home from College (outside of school holidays) were
an intoxicating whirlwind of parties, drinking and hi-jinks. Yet with each trip
we returned home a bit more different and the distance between old friends and
attitudes started to be unsettling. We came back more book wise and brain
refined but penniless and missing 95% of the experiences our friends had shared
in the intervening weeks. Visits home were certainly not an opportunity to
discuss why I was so taken with Yevgeny Yevtushenko’s poem Zima Junction and how it resonated with my own homecomings. The
best I could hope for was that my gift of the latest Skyhooks, or an early
AC/DC album or condoms (the Queenstown Chemist refused to stock these items)
kept me in the “not completely weird” category. In addition, if I kept drinking
the beers my mates would buy for the ‘poor student bum,’ I was okay. During those years my reputation was not
associated with academic achievement but my return to the cricket pitch for the
summer and more importantly my capacity to win bets in drinking competitions
for my old school mates. Back at the Hostel it was like returning to a low key
prison (controlled hours, study periods, little money, no regular supply of
grog and regular surveillance).
Leaf 17 “Prime Ministers, academics and
future judges” Wellington, New Zealand, April 1996
In a small
elegant café in Wellington in 1996, I sat across the table from my friend, Sir
Geoffrey Palmer, the former Prime Minister of New Zealand. A working friendship
had formed after I read his article on teaching administrative law and designed
my first course using many of his ideas. We started a warm, but infrequent
postal, correspondence in the early 1990s. During a visit to Wellington in 2002,
we caught up again when Sir Geoffrey was a very active member of a very small
audience for a talk I gave comparing FOI in Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
At a later conference in Wellington in November 2008 he lavished praise on my
research and analysis of FOI in front of Ombudsmen, FOI Commissioners,
government officials, leading NGO activists and academics from around the
world. It was praise rarely given from a man more often willing to be a stern
and unrestrained critic.
In 1996 I was in Wellington as the inaugural
visiting fellow of the newly launched New Zealand Institute of Public Law. I
had contacted the Institute, as I was starting on a project looking at the
beginnings of the New Zealand Official Information Act, just as they were
trying to find their first visiting fellow. From this serendipitous linking
came one of the great friendships of my life. Paul Walker QC, an up and coming
administrative and insurance lawyer from Brickfields Chambers, in London had
taken leave from his chambers to be the first Director of the Centre for two
years. His wife Jo Andrews, a well known ITN political journalist, came with
him. She continued to file reports back to the UK. To my mind, Paul is the archetypal ‘ideal’
lawyer – thoughtful, prepared, diplomatic, considered, engaging with a depth of
humanity that I could only envy. During his two years setting up the Centre
Paul attended Maori language classes and would begin each of his administrative
law classes with a new Maori phrase. He
would go on to be the lead counsel in the Mad Cow Tribunal and later would be
appointed as a judge in the UK. Paul started his studies at Adelaide Law School
but despite academic success in his first year felt the need for a break. The
teaching style of the Law School had failed to grab his imagination. He went to
Paris and took up bartending for a few months before moving onto Oxford, met Jo
and stayed in the UK. Our families have since become close friends sharing
holidays and their home in London and their cottage ‘Longknowe’, in northern
Northumberland, has become part of our lives.
On my
first trip to the UK, in 1999, I stopped over in London and made my way to Paul
and Jo’s house in Camden Town for a beautiful informal meal. They later moved
to Tufnell Park and their spare bedroom became a familiar and comfortable base
for all of our family when visiting London.
Paul had become senior counsel on the Mad Cow Tribunal and incredibly
busy. Jo’s career as a political journalist was also intense. Many nights
during my London stopovers I would get back to Tufnell Park early in the
evening, catch up with my work, welcome Paul home around 8 or 9 pm, then watch
Jo on the ITN Late News at 10pm, share a whiskey and peaceful conversation with
Paul, followed by a few words with Jo as she returned from Whitehall or the ITN
studios towards 11pm. Jo would then fill
us in with the inside stories of what we had watched on the news. Jo is well educated, bright, intolerant of
fuzzy thinking and capable of dining with the Queen or having breakfast over a
billy in the wilds of Northumberland. Her dad went to Oxford and her mother to
Cambridge, creating an intense but friendly family rivalry.
In
2001 I learned Paul had testicular cancer and was undergoing intense treatment.
I decided to cancel my next stay with Paul and Jo and started to look for
alternative accommodation. Jo wrote back saying Paul’s spirits would be lifted
by my staying with them. It was a tough few days as Paul was incredibly weak
and easily tired but our friendship deepened during that visit.
In
2002 the Snell family descended on Tufnell Park, London. Elise and Lance hit it
off with Florence, Paul and Jo’s daughter. Lance, tall and good looking,
boosted Florence’s stocks around her friends, Elise and Florence were both
horse mad. Esther and Jo had mutual respect for each other’s talents. After a
week crammed together at Tufnell Park, we all headed in two taxis to a packed
King’s Cross Station on the Queen’s Birthday weekend (not a good time to
travel) for a journey to Northumberland and an idyllic stay at Longknowe. Longknowe is a converted pair of shepherd’s cottages located in a
remote valley. The farmhouse is rented out during the year but Jo and Paul
reserve several weeks to stay there with family and friends.
Leaf 18 “Four Eyes, Four squared and
learning to hide lights under bushels” Queenstown late 1960s
Sometime
in late primary school I started to fail class tests. Up to that point, test
questions had been oral and I aced the tests. Now the tests were written on the
blackboard and my desk was at the back of the room and I couldn’t see. I
avoided this problem for a while – continuing to fail tests, but I think I was
picked up in a visiting eye test and an appointment was made with the local GP.
For my troubles I acquired a set of thick heavy framed prescription glasses that
burdened me with the problem of being called squared or four eyes. The offset
was an improvement in my cricket batting. However, I stopped playing football,
almost a sin on the West Coast, to partly avoid breaking my glasses, but also because
playing in the rain, a common occurrence, was almost impossible. I kept hoping
someone would invent wipers for glasses.
Throughout
most of my teenage years I was socially plagued and weighed down by my glasses
and in most photos they are absent. Later I overcame the problem of my glasses
being sent flying in contact sports by tying a piece of string, or elastic, to
the arms of the frames. By the end of Grade 6 I had climbed back up the
academic ladder and was one of the top five students and possibly, one of the
rare achievers who was not a child of the local elite. Yet the grief directed
at me, from the ‘locals’, for this touch of academic achievement taught me to
run with the rest of the pack rather than towards the front. So for the
remainder of my education, including university, I was content to cruise and
just slap together enough to get by. The only motivator I had was that my exam
performance was always so abysmal that I put big efforts into written
assignments to give myself a chance of passing each course.
Leaf 19 “Canada calling…..” March 2001
On a Thursday
morning, about 9.30 am, my office phone rang.
At the other end of the phone was a female with a thick and almost
exaggerated French accent. My initial response was is this a prank call when “The
Voice” asked, “Is that Monsieur Reeck Snellll …. please hold I have President
Madame Delagraveee on the line for you.” On the line was another female: “Monsieur
Snelll you do not knowww me but I know of uuuu….” Warning bells were ringing. Was
this a Crazy Call from the Kym and Dave radio program? Was it Stefan Petrow or
Lynden Griggs, two academic colleagues, with devilish inclinations, trying to
hoodwink me?
I
decided to go along with the caller but very wearily. It seemed they were with
some Canadian taskforce looking into FOI. I recalled a friend from Canberra
mentioning a group of Canadians had visited Canberra a few weeks previously for
that purpose. So if this was a hoax, the caller was very well informed. The
caller stated she had stayed back at work in Ottawa to make this call, another bit of attention to detail. The
Taskforce researchers had overlooked New Zealand (whose Act is called the
Official Information Act rather than the FOI Act – a basic research mistake but
feasible) and whilse in Canberra they had been constantly told they should talk
with me (their research had missed me, the FoI
Review a journal I edited and New Zealand). Someone had given them a copy
of my article, “Kiwi Paradox.” that rammed home to them their error both in
terms of New Zealand and my thoughts on FOI design.
The
taskforce was originally conceived as an internal government review but
ironically, had been outed by a series of FOI requests and had now become a
fully public review. By the time of the phone call, the Taskforce’s activities
were under a great deal of scrutiny and they were now in a bind. How could they
make up for their research gap? There was a quick discussion about the
possibility of flying me to New Zealand at Easter while a member of the
Taskforce slipped out of Canada and visited the Kiwis and me in New Zealand.
This option was quickly canned. Ms Delagrave, said they were unable to pay for
my travel to Canada (which would alert the press to their oversight) but if I
was in Canada the taskforce would be happy to pay my internal transportation
costs, put me up in a hotel for a couple of weeks and cover my other costs. At
the end of the call I asked the caller to email to confirm the arrangement
(still slightly suspicious it might be a hoax). A few minutes later I got my
confirmation email from the Task Force and then found their web site. A few
weeks later I was in Canada.
I
stayed at the Capital Hill Hotel. It had plainly seen better days but was still
seen as a prime place to stay because of its location in the heart of Ottawa.
The Task Force was allocated a temporary suite of offices across the street
from my hotel. When I stay anywhere for
a few days I like to find a café I can establish as a base because of the food,
service and location. I found a cellar café around the corner that served this
purpose for me. My days were spent working with a group of very bright,
ambitious and multi-lingual public servants. Often, work place conversations or
even sentences would begin in English and finish in French. The circumstances
surrounding the Task Force’s creation meant it had a multi-million dollar
budget even if it was monitored zealously by the media. At that tim,e the Task
Force was responsible for the largest ever set of commissioned research
projects into FOI exceeding any previous governmental or academic efforts
anywhere in the world.
My
role was to be an in-house expert and idea generator and to feed into the
process insights I had gained from my comparative work about FOI in Australia
and New Zealand. Another part of the task was to provide seminars to a steering
group of Deputy Secretaries (like agency heads in Australia).
The interchange of ideas, insights between my academic, comparative and applicant perspective and the insights fed in from the commissioned research and the bureaucratic experience of the Task Force team led to a number of major conceptual insights about FOI reform and processes. A number of these appeared in the final report of the Task Force and a number of others continued to be refined further in my research, teaching, and work in places like Cambodia, then fed back into the Australian law reform process that led to the emergence of FOI 2.0. Probably the three major conceptual developments were that: first, FOI should be approached as a system (requiring attention to legislation, public service and user culture and areas such as capacity, training etc); second, the emphasis should be on the front end of the process (making information proactively available or determining its confidentiality on the merits of the information removed from considerations of who is asking for it and why); and finally, FOI should be viewed as a system of a number of interrelated parts and relationships (records management, public service capacity, technology capacity, training, demand and supply).
The interchange of ideas, insights between my academic, comparative and applicant perspective and the insights fed in from the commissioned research and the bureaucratic experience of the Task Force team led to a number of major conceptual insights about FOI reform and processes. A number of these appeared in the final report of the Task Force and a number of others continued to be refined further in my research, teaching, and work in places like Cambodia, then fed back into the Australian law reform process that led to the emergence of FOI 2.0. Probably the three major conceptual developments were that: first, FOI should be approached as a system (requiring attention to legislation, public service and user culture and areas such as capacity, training etc); second, the emphasis should be on the front end of the process (making information proactively available or determining its confidentiality on the merits of the information removed from considerations of who is asking for it and why); and finally, FOI should be viewed as a system of a number of interrelated parts and relationships (records management, public service capacity, technology capacity, training, demand and supply).
At
times - when I find myself having my brain picked by the UK Foreign Office,
senior public servants and government ministers in Tonga and Cambodia,
academics around the globe often flown at great expense by my hosts – I am
struck by the lack of invitations from within my own country and state.
Leaf 20 “If only the Big Bang Theory had
been 25 years earlier” Queenstown 1973
Year 9
in high school was a bleak time in terms of my academic growth and development.
Earlier, in Year 8, Mrs Shepherd a young science teacher had flamed my interest
in science with her enthusiasm. This
association with a teacher’s passion and enthusiasm and an obvious interest in
their subject matter continued to be reinforced for me by a very small number
of teachers from that point on. More importantly, she had sown the seed that
would eventually grow into my decision to leave the West Coast for further
education. She talked about how you could pursue science at university, a place
I had never heard of. She mentioned you
could even get a PhD (for many years I never knew what this was but the 3
letters had a power all of their own and when people asked what I was doing my
answer was ‘I might eventually get a PhD – still to be achieved).
Mrs
Shepherd was the first of a very small handful of high school, college and
university teachers who kept my interest in learning alive and inspired me to
continue a difficult journey. Yet my interest and skill in maths and science
disappeared within a year. Our new maths teacher in Year 9 made maths unclear
and boring. A replacement science teacher, just out of teaching school, mumbled
and stumbled his way through classes and I lost all interest. About this time
my dreams to build a home-made rocket of tin foil and balsa wood and glue
literally collapsed and despite devouring every science book, I was never quite
able to crack the trick behind storing, compressing and releasing home made
oxygen and hydrogen (the making of these gases was simple). The Apollo space
program didn’t seem to have these basic problems. My aspirations to win a Noble
Prize for Science never left the foothills of Mt Owen.