Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Memoir - Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career


 

 The Memoir - a work in progress

Background see Working on a Memoir
Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia
Leaves 7-9 Hooning, Teaching & Presenting
Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career
Leaves 12-14 Car crash, Launceston early 1960s, A Road Not Taken

Leaf 10 “Saturday interludes as a book merchant” Winter 1987 Hobart

Esther had just returned to work full time in the Tax Office and I had taken six months leave to look after Lance, our 7 month old son. At the time it was rare for woman to return to work that soon (especially whilst still expressing milk) and very rare for a young father to be in daily control of a young baby. I encountered numerous hurdles: there were no baby changing facilities in men’s toilets in the city (so in an emergency had to change Lance on the floor of toilets): very few gentlemen rush to help you with prams on the steps of the GPO: baby gear bags came in few macho styles or colours: and mothers’ groups were strangely uninviting. At the time, the decision was partly motivated by Esther’s career appearing to be on a more upward track whilst mine had hit a couple of bumps. After a few temporary escapes from the Tax Office acting at higher levels in other Departments (and making the final recruitment selection rounds into the Australian diplomatic service), I found myself back in Tax at a fairly low level with little prospect of  advancement.
For the previous 12 months, we had operated a casual book and record stall at Salamanca Market. We started the stall simply to make space for a nursery by selling off excess books and records. However, we also started to buy books for resale. As a casual stallholder, I had to drive down to Salamanca on the Hobart waterfront around 3 am on a Saturday morning to claim my site for the day. Some casual stallholders got there before midnight, to ensure that they would have a ‘good’ site. And, from time to time there were early morning fist fights in the car park as ‘regulars’ tried to impose the ‘normal rules to get a casual site’ with newbies who not only parked in the wrong areas, but often jumped the invisible queue for casual sites. 
The Hobart City Council announced it would allocate a large number of sites on a permanent basis on a first come-first served basis on the following Monday morning. Driving by City Hall on Sunday afternoon we noticed a long queue of people with chairs, thermoses and sleeping bags and we decided, given the length of the line, it was not worth the effort to camp overnight. On Monday morning Esther called from work and suggested that it might be worthwhile to see if any stalls were left. I arrived at City Hall after Lance had woken from his morning nap and we found ourselves on the end of a short queue. I received the second last stall, and from that point on we have had a permanent presence at a Salamanca Market for the last 28 years.
Lance, and later his sister Elise, grew up around this stall.  In my mind, there are pictures of a heavily pregnant Esther helping to unload bookcases, both Lance and Elise as young babies in bassinets under the trestles, Lance as a toddler with a label saying “Please return to Stall 145,” a small lad of five drinking a milkshake behind a card table where he is selling his old toys, a young boy playing cricket on the lawns of parliament with other young stall off-spring we called munchkins, and a young man lounging around catching up on his reading or sleep.  In the last few years, Lance has been replaced by Elise - when she is not travelling, horse riding or recovering from Friday nights. She too tends to lounge around (in the winter months, covered head to toe with a blanket), catching up on reading and sleep.

Leaf 11 “Vexatious FOI applicants and flimsy career  foundations” 2000 Hobart

I received a phone call from the University lawyers. A notorious and vexatious FOI applicant, a n interstate lawyer, had asked the University for all the information in my personnel file. I had annoyed the applicant by appearing, the previous year, before a Queensland Parliamentary Committee on FOI, where I claimed some people had called me a serial FOI applicant. For some unknown reason, this had annoyed him and he was now keen to find evidence that challenged my credentials or undermined my creditability and reputation. The University was keen to resist the challenge but I was much more relaxed and suggested we could give him everything he wanted. However, as a compromise, I asked to see my file before making a final decision. The file was very thick so the University FOI officer allowed me to read it all.

In many ways, it was an unusual level of complete access granted to me but also it was an eye opener. First, I discovered that one of my often used referees, a well known academic and later judge, was often lukewarm in his support of my applications – a much different attitude then conveyed in my other encounters with him. Second, my initial appointment as a law tutor in 1990 was far more problematic then I had realised. The appointment had often been sold in public by the Law School as a bold and novel experiment by the Law School to deliberately add a different dimension to the teaching of public law by incorporating a political science perspective.  In many ways, this official ‘endorsement’ of seeking an innovative approach to public law teaching guided my efforts over the next few years. However, I discovered the reality was much different and far from an endorsement. I had actually been the last candidate out of four applicants standing. Like the Olympic ice skater Steve Bradbury, I had emerged as the last contestant still in the race. Unlike Steve who knew his medal had been the result of fate, I spent several years operating with a false understanding. In retrospect, these two discoveries, the less than supportive referee and the real reason I had been given a job as a law tutor, explained in part, some of the difficulties I experienced in gaining a tenured appointment at the Law School. My academic career had begun on a far more tenuous thread than I ever imagined.

I consistently justified and defended my attempts at creating a different type of teaching and learning environment on the basis that the Law School had deliberately hired someone who was ‘different’ than the typical or traditional law academic. Indeed, I was different:  I had a less than stellar undergraduate record as a law student; my primary focus was political science; and my employment experience had not been as a lawyer but as a public servant. The truth is, I might have stumbled at the first hurdle, or simply given up, if I had realised that I had only been given my opportunity to teach because the Law School was desperate and because I ‘waited’ for several weeks after the interview, to ask how my application was progressing.

Despite these rocky beginnings, I ended up with a great career and the Law School and University continue to reap, in terms of international reputation and positive impact on student learning, an unexpected windfall that has lasted a couple of decades rather than the intended temporary desperate stop gap measure.

Friday, October 5, 2012

Memoir Leaves 7-9, Hooning, Teaching & Presenting



 
At the moment the memoir consists of a series of leaves or postcards that slip between time periods without following a chronology or trying to tell a structured story.
 
 Appreciate feedback, reactions and suggestions.
  
 Blue Echo
Cover art: with kind permission of Rachel-Ireland-Meyers (see http://www.redbubble.com/people/grace4)

 The Memoir - a work in progress

Background see Working on a Memoir
Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia
Leaves 7-9 Hooning, Teaching & Presenting
Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career
Leaves 12-14 Car crash, Launceston early 1960s, A Road Not Taken



Leaf 7  “My last hooning on a Friday night in Queenstown” December 1980
It was a warm Friday night in Queenstown. Part of me relished the surge of adrenalin and the thrill of being with my childhood mates. I even made the link with the antics of my favourite Beat authors and envisaged how this was like a scene from On The Road. Yet the law student and political science major in me was thinking “what shit have you got yourself into”? I was 22 and John Lennon had just died. I was back home working underground in the Mt Lyell mine during my university holidays. I was in the back seat of a station wagon with a carton of beer cans on my lap. Massive sparks were rising up from the back of the car as it hurtled dangerously around corners. There were eight or more young men and boys in the car, three or four of them in the back hurling cans, empty I hoped, at a pursuing police car. In a mining town like Queenstown, police, doctors, teachers and mine management were always treated as outsiders and at times enemies, at best they were tolerated in a very uneasy relationship.
I was thinking of that Dylan lyric, “They got him on conspiracy, they were never sure who with” and that there would be no doubt this time.  Some of the guys in the car were old school mates, some relatives and other younger ones were like I was at fifteen - full of grog on a Friday night and so filled to the brim with excitement there was little room for foresight. At one point, the wheels on one side of the car left the ground as we drifted through the tight roundabout on Driffield Street designed for a much slower speed. We had a good driver, a veteran of many hair-raising episodes like this, but everything rests on fate. Our destination was the Webster’s old house on Robertson Street, a couple of houses from my old family home. We skidded to a halt, everyone vacated the car and spread themselves around the lounge room pretending to have been there all night long. The cops grabbed the driver took him outside and gave him a bit of a belting for being another Queenie smart arse. Later that night, we engaged repeatedly in several very drunken and heartfelt full renditions of American Pie.
Over the next few hours and sometimes over the following years I played this night through a series of lenses. One lens is that of the lucky survivor of a ‘What if’ scenario. What if the car had rolled on that roundabout? The headlines would have read, like many headlines over the years in small country towns, ‘Tragedy and heartbreak as young men die in accident’. Another lens is that of a young man inexorably drifting away from his childhood mates and hometown. In another lens I converted the experience, almost as it is happening, into a poem, novel or a piece of reflective narrative rather than a simple story of hell raising that is quickly forgotten among the episodes of every day life or wild nights in a mining town. No one else in that car had by their bed a copy of, or echoing in their head parts of, Yevgeny Yevushenko’s Zima Station:
I had been thinking, and I wondered whether
I would see any changes when I got in.
I figured if it wasn"t any better
at least it wasn"t worse than it had been.
But everything appeared to be small,
the chemist"s shop, the city park and all.
It seemed that things had shrunk and therefore
were smaller than had been nine years before.
As  I was circling around the vicinity
I gradually came to realise
that it was not the streets that had become diminutive,
it was my steps that now were big in size.

Simply having the options of playing with my thoughts branded me in my own mind as an intruder. If the thoughts had been given a voice or shared on paper I would have been branded an outsider. This was my last summer in Queenstown, a summer working underground with my cousins, catching the mine bus to work with my uncles, staying with my Nan, listening to the direct and caustic wisdom of my aunties, trying to remember all the names of the various tribes of my younger cousins, watching girls I had hopeless school crushes on push their second or third babies around town. After this I rarely returned and the gaps started to stretch into years and decades. I no longer fitted comfortably within my home town.
Leaf 8 “Not another brick in the wall” Hobart May 1997
In the front row of the assembled academics at law graduation, I had tears in my eyes
Sitting in an upper balcony, my parents, Esther and our two young children looked down on this created ritual with medieval overtones that explicitly and symbolically distanced the graduates from their past. That was the first and last exposure of my parents, both diverted from their own education journeys, to university life and the annual pomp, colour and ceremony of university graduation. I had skipped my previous two graduation ceremonies not realising that the events were more for family than for the student. The tears were caused by a spontaneous standing ovation from the law graduates as my name was read out as the recipient of a Vice Chancellor’s Teaching Excellence Award.


Receiving the award was a needed capstone to a long and difficult 6 year journey as a law teacher: a journey filled with uncertainty about employment; a journey where my teaching methods had been viewed as abnormal; and a journey in which my young family  too often came second behind teaching, a masters thesis in political science and attempts to build a profile as a legal researcher. In my journey as a new teacher. I had rejected mainstream approaches to law teaching but the replacements I was testing were largely untried, intuitive and assembled from a multitude of ‘unorthodox” sources. Every class, every new technique or different type of assessment was launched with the prospect that failure or a mistake would see the end of a new career, and the fragile and uncertain indicators of success (testimonials from students) were regarded by many of my superiors and colleagues around me as at best, generally unreliable or at worst, just plain not worth the paper they were written on.


In 1990, after a couple of years of teaching a handful of political science tutorials part time, I had taken the gamble of forging a new career. Leaving behind the two years of developing a tutor’s surface level expertise in Australian, American and South Pacific politics and political philosophy, I made the switch to Law. Over the next few years, I struggled to complete my left over Masters in Political Science (including a complete topic switch – from Industrial Democracy in Australia to Politics in Western Samoa) whilst building up expertise in Property Law (a subject failed as an undergraduate LLB student.  Indeed, I have a rare distinction among Australian law academics of failing two undergraduate units and having no honours degree in law), Constitutional Law (rarely attended as an undergraduate) Administrative Law (vaguely recalled) and Advanced Administrative Law.  In addition to my teaching and research, I had two small children and a market stall at Salamanca Market where I sold ‘pre-loved’ books on Saturdays.
From 1990 to 1993 I struggled to win a ‘permanent’ position, and was employed on a year to year basis (albeit with a safety net of a position remaining open for me at the Tax Office). However in 1993, that safety net disappeared and for several months I was in limbo as the Law School delayed confirming if I had successfully gained a tenured position. This was a tough period for me: two young children, Lance, who was 7 years old and Elise ,just over 2, and a wife who I had vowed, never to place in the financially precarious position her family had faced when she was young, when her father took his own life leaving behind a young wife and two young girls to put back the pieces. Every time I took a risk, each time I failed to get shortlisted for a contract position, every time I riled my Head of Department, a judge, a student or a Premier, I was confronted with a growing temptation to simply turn aside and settle for the security of a low level position in the Tax Office.
In the face of this employment uncertainty, I was coming to grips with the hard core knowledge of several law subjects and my publishing efforts were still in the early stages. In most academic disciplines, staff are recruited because of their expertise in particular niche areas yet in Law no second thoughts are given to pitching a legal academic into any number of new areas. 
I had taught myself to teach and the ceremony in 1997 was a vindication, in part for the hard choices, struggles and the risks associated with wanting to offer students a better learning experience than I had generally encountered in my university days. The award and ceremony was also a point where I started to be much more systematic and professional about understanding and improving the learning processes associated with my teaching. The experience of others in most universities reflected my own introduction into the ‘profession’ of higher education teaching – the sink or swim method.  The award confirmed I had learned to swim! The award also gave me a degree of immunity to continue to explore and develop my teaching practices.
 “Prelude to Leaf 8  - Just another brick in the wall….” Political Science Department UTAS 1988
Desperate to escape the confines of a low level clerical job in the Tax Office, I enrolled in a Masters of Political Science degree in early 1988. The original plan of doing this while being a full time parent to a 6 month old in late 1987 quickly evaporated in the reality of nappies, washing and 100% focus on a small, often uncooperative, human. The following year I became the first male to go part-time in the Hobart Tax Office and commenced my political science thesis. My Political Science mentor felt the best way to dust off my mental cobwebs was to do some part time teaching.
I knocked nervously on the door. My postgraduate supervisor had arranged an appointment with the coordinator of first year political science. Ironically, but true to form, I had skipped most of my lectures in first year pol sci – to sit on the grass and look at girls, listen to music and read books that were not listed on my reading lists – Gunter Grass, Camus, books about revolutionary priests in Latin America and mercenaries in Africa. I didn’t know what to expect behind the door. In the public service where I was still employed, every job vacancy required applications and the extensive addressing of numerous selection criteria, interviews and reference checks. I was flying blind with this ‘job’. Teaching at university was a serious business wasn’t it?  Although I then recalled a number of the abysmal tutors inflicted on students in my undergraduate degree and was totally uncertain about what awaited me behind that door.
A strong voice boomed “enter”. Before me was a distracted, bearded academic who clearly had no idea why I was there. The floor was covered with newspaper and two large puppies were busy staining and smearing the newspapers. On the surrounding walls, hundreds of thick tomes on communism in Russia, China and elsewhere appeared to be in the process of tumbling off the shelves. In desperation I tried to recall some vague points about communist politics and failed. After a few stops and starts we realised why I was there – “Room 536 Tuesday at 9am and Wednesday at 10am. See Bev.”  Who was Bev? Bev was the departmental secretary and my major teaching point of contact and leadership for the next two years. There was no hand over of notes, course details or any further discussion about the course. I left the room a fully licensed tutor with an open permit to play with the minds of first year political science students. My university teaching career was underway and I never looked back. Twenty plus years later the support and training of casual tutors has generally improved yet there are still far more tutors than there should be who still start in the same fashion as I did.


Leaf 9 “Fast Talking” and “my short life as a spy” March 2003 Jakarta, Indonesia

I was inside a large assembly hall within the Indonesian Parliament building, speaking to a gathering of Indonesian parliamentarians, civil society activists, military personnel, journalists and a handful of other international experts. Earlier on, the entire conference had been bussed to the Presidential Palace and the five international speakers had been presented to President Megawati at a very elaborate and formal ceremony. As I shook the President’s hand my thoughts went back 20 years to writing endless papers on Indonesian politics and history at uni and how I could not have envisaged the path from that small classroom in Tasmania to the Presidential Palace in Jakarta.
My talk, after we were returned to the Parliament, had a few small hiccups.  At the start, a frantic representative from the translators interrupted my talk after a couple of sentences saying, “Mr Rick, Mr Rick you talk even faster than Mr Toby (the previous speaker Toby Mendel a Canadian had been asked to slow down about 15 minutes into his talk) please slow down and can you confirm you are speaking English?” My lingering speech problems had emerged yet again. Later in the Question and Answer period an Indonesian gentleman accused me of being an agent of the Australian intelligence services attempting to undermine Indonesian security by allowing access to sensitive secrets. Later that night I was in a Muslim nightclub, swept up in the beat and for the first time to enjoy the bonding of Muslim men dancing together.
The invitation to speak had been organised through Article 19, an international non-government organisation focused on freedom of expression and speech issues. The five day trip involved a whirlwind round of talks and events in Jakarta and Manila to promote and assist with the development of FOI in those two countries. I had managed to organise my teaching schedule to make the journey, but the striking contrast between these two versions of my working life was palpable. On one hand, I left behind, and was shortly returning to, a group of students who struggled to be moved by what I was trying to teach them and always left the lectures and seminars seemingly unimpressed with what they had endured. I was simply another boring academic paid to disrupt their far more interesting social and work lives. On the other hand, my short 10-15 minute talks to several hundred politicians, activists, lawyers and others were considered, debated and applauded.
‘On tour’, my days were filled by all expenses paid airfares, accommodation and meals and opportunities to meet and spend time with interesting people who were working hard to make a difference in their homelands. At a meeting in Manila, the next leg of the tour, I sat next to a beautiful young woman, one of a handful of truly breathtaking people I have encountered. She had just graduated from film school and had recently returned from the civil conflict on Mindanao where she had been travelling alone creating a film about social justice. During our meeting, she exploded in frustration and railed against the old lawyers (including me) in the room who were debating the meaning of technical words in legislation thereby excluding the likes of her and many other ordinary people from making the law do what they needed it to do.
Every meeting since, every time when I am invited to assist in the law reform process in another country, or the rarer times in my own country, my thoughts go back to that fiery outburst and the young Filipina’s passion. I try and make that extra effort to include the non-lawyer, non-expert voice into the process and to make the technical words work for them rather than cut down their hopes and aspirations for the law.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

"Demise of Hollydene Hostel"



 Published as  “Demise of Hollydene,” Weekend Extra, The Advocate, 15 November 2003, 34




An opportunity that, in retrospect, was so fragile. It needed many ingredients.  Teachers to plant the seed that there was a road that led beyond my beloved hills. Parents ready to struggle to find money in an already tight budget. Most important it needed a place to stay. Hollydene Hostel.

In the mid 1970s Hollydene served as a safe base in Hobart for country boys to step onto the road to higher education. Few made it through to successful completion of year 12 but without Hollydene many more would have fallen by the wayside. That would have caused the early and unnecessary  termination in the careers of a number of very good engineers, teachers, scientists and the odd outspoken academic.

Hollydene was, even in the 1970s, rundown but it  provided a place my parents knew they could entrust the care of their son. A 16 year old  who lacked experience, maturity and the finances to survive in a flat or shared private accommodation with other young country kids in a strange city.  Hollydene, located in Campbell Street, was not a paradise and we all struggled against its curfews, hostel rules and restrictions on heating in winter time. Yet it provided a sense of community and day to day stability. It wasn’t a home but that was a major part of its attraction.

The sale of Hollydene raises a simple question. What is there now to replace it? In a letter dated 27 October 2003 to the Mountain Heights School Council (Queenstown) Paula Wriedt, the Minister for Education suggests that there is a trend away from the “more structured and supervised hostel accommodation” . Therefore West Coast parents wanting to send their children on to Year 11 should “liaise with the senior secondary colleges to establish networks of home-stay accommodation within the individual college communities”.

Simply not good enough Minister.

When you close a major accommodation hostel and fail to replace it there will definitely be a trend towards private board or rental accommodation. There are no other alternatives if students wish to study in Hobart. The direct retention rates (never very good) of Year 10 to full time Year 11 in 2003 from Mountain Heights dropped from 68% in 2002 to a dismal 43-47% (if you count students who have moved interstate). In today’s information age this is tantamount to slamming shut the doors of opportunity on kids who out of choice or necessity went to school on the West Coast.

Yes at sixteen I briefly toyed with the idea of sharing a flat with one of my mates until the reality of the search for accommodation, rents, furniture, cooking and cleaning changed my mind. The hit or miss of home stay accommodation (in terms of compatibility, reliability and availability) was easily outweighed by the benefits of structured and supervised hostel accommodation. The privacy of your own room, the availability of food, laundry and scheduled study periods and a base to explore a new city and lifestyle with a degree of independence.

The closure of Hollydene and the refusal to provide country kids (and the resulting parental peace of mind) with a replacement, state of the art  hostel accommodation (designed for the needs of 16-17 year olds) borders on absolute neglect. Yes it would be costly but what price are we prepared to pay to allow all our children equality of participation in further education be it going onto University, VET or other paths such as apprenticeships.

I never returned to visit Hollydene but I would be surprised if successive governments did much to maintain or improve the hostel from the late 1970s too its closure. From time to time it falls to particular Ministers and Governments to lay down the costly foundations and invest for future generations. The rebuilding of Reece High School was an opportunity to improve education in the North West. The replacement of Hollydene would be an opportunity to improve the educational prospects of the best and brightest from many small country schools around this state who would like to study in Hobart. It is unfeasible and simply too limiting to rely on all West Coast students (and students from country/remote areas) to move only to Launceston or Burnie.

Without a Hollydene Hostel in Hobart  my life would have been far different. I now have a life beyond the imagining of a young boy thirty years ago. I still remember a family relative driving me to Hobart in a Mini Moke with my bags in the back. As I stepped onto the footpath to walk through those famous heavy doors of Hollydene I had no hint about the career or life I would discover. Yet Hollydene gave me the opportunity to find out.   I am troubled that 30 years later that fragile opportunity given to me is now even more fragile and problematic.

Providing secure and good quality accommodation will  improve retention rates. Yet why are these retention rates for Mountain Heights students falling? More importantly what is the Education Department doing about the problem? By all means travel the world beating the drum to entice parents from other countries to send their children to study in Tasmania.  But don’t neglect our own backyard.




Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Memoir - Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia


At the moment the memoir consists of a series of leaves or postcards that slip between time periods without following a chronology or trying to tell a structured story.
 
 Appreciate feedback, reactions and suggestions.
  
Cover art: with kind permission of Rachel-Ireland-Meyers (see http://www.redbubble.com/people/grace4)
 Blue Echo

 The Memoir - a work in progress

Background see Working on a Memoir
Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia
Leaves 7-9 Hooning, Teaching & Presenting
Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career
Leaves 12-14 Car crash, Launceston early 1960s, A Road Not Taken



Leaf 2 “Returning to Erin” Ireland April 1999

I stood at the podium in St Patrick’s Hall deep inside Dublin Castle. Towering gilt covered columns and large mirrors lined the walls. Thin, long banners floated down the walls in between the mirrors and columns.  Many of the banners bore cattle motifs belonging to the Anglo-Irish nobility who gathered here century after century at the beck and call of their English monarchs. Above me, three massive painted panels by Vincenzo Valdre covered high and sweeping ceilings. The first depicted the coronation of King George III, the second, Saint Patrick introducing Christianity to Ireland, and the final painting was of King Henry II receiving the submission of the Irish Chieftains. This hall had, for centuries, sent a sharp message to the Irish, from nobility to peasant, about power and dominion.
 

The Irish Government/University of Cork sponsored FOI Conference was a rare opportunity for a junior lecturer to speak at such a venue in another country. I faced a sea of Irish faces, many bearing a striking resemblance to those I saw every day in Tasmania, including my cousins on the Cody and Gleeson sides of the family. I was extremely nervous despite repeated rehearsals in the morning shower, I had not yet found the right opening. Finding the start of a talk or lecture is always the difficult moment for me. 

If I can get an interesting opening or one that I can use as a hook, the rest of the talk flows naturally. Yet until I see the venue, and get a feel for the audience and the atmosphere, it is hard to crystallise the opening. Looking out on the assembled Irish public servants, journalists and academics, finally inspiration came to me as I waited on stage to be introduced.  I found the ‘hook’:  a link between my theme of government transparency, the history made within the confines of Dublin Castle  and  my mother’s ancestors being transported from Ireland in the 1840s. My talk had found its beginning:
“I find it strange to be standing here today- at the heart of colonial British administration from the place where my ancestors, male and female in chains, were transported as criminals to the other end of the world – talking about access to government information. I’m the first of their descendants to return to this country and after three months of living with ‘soft days’ I know why my ancestors never returned home.” 

Over the next 12 months I revisited parts of my Irish ancestors’ long, slow route to Australia. I gave invited talks in Cape Town, where their leaky old transport ships would have rested at anchor, and later at the Rocks in Sydney where they were likely to have berthed before being consigned like trade goods or human cattle to Van Diemen’s Land. In all three places my talks were given in the converted buildings of the British colonial regime – in Dublin Castle, a converted prison in Cape Town and the old government buildings in Sydney.

The invitation to Dublin was achieved through networking, a skill few academics or public servants seem to master despite the fortune spent on business cards and the piles of cards collected and distributed at conferences.  An email from people given one of my cards is rare. On the other hand within a week of returning from a trip, I’ve emailed everyone whose details I collected. If no reply is forthcoming, they are allowed to drift out of my networks. If someone replies, they go into one of my contact lists (administrative law teachers, FOI contacts, personal, by location or some other category). Only 5% of those I contact ever keep in touch. Yet in 20 years, this 5% has turned into a significant network. Networks are like gardens requiring regular attention where seeds germinate, bloom and often fade away over time.

 In early December 1998, I received an email from Maeve McDonagh, a striking red-haired academic from University College Cork. Maeve was an Irish expert on FOI who had worked in Australia. We met via the FoI Review, a publication I edited for a decade, and Maeve had visited Tasmania a few years previously for a seminar and stayed with my family. She had arrived in late November (late Spring) only to encounter snow falling on the mountain where we live. Maeve is one of those vibrant Galway women with a lilting voice and flashing eyes which give enough warning signs to know you would want to avoid her ire.  Maeve’s email  asked if I could help Cork Law School with a problem. Each year in January they invited a US academic to Ireland who would teach a legal writing class in return for an airfare and a small stipend. All that was required was a few hours of lectures, some one-on-one feedback with a hundred or more Irish, Spanish and German students over a four month period and marking two sets of essays. An American legal writing teacher (a position yet to gain a significant foothold in Australia) had cancelled at the very last moment and they needed someone within three weeks.

Frantic consultations with family, the Dean of the Law School and the deployment of my annual and long service leave found me committed to living for four months in Ireland whilst my family remained in Tasmania.  My return to ‘home soil’ after a 40 hour journey was almost thwarted as the Garda (Police) insisted on a work permit and seemed unmoved by my explanations that the people at Cork Law School had said it would be okay to complete the details (which only they had) on the form after arriving, an arrangement not cleared with the authorities.  It was Cork, late Saturday night and I was an Australian, so I was allowed in with a passport stamp saying  “report to the nearest Garda Station in 10 days,” a deadline my Irish colleagues kept insisting could blissfully be ignored. Meanwhile, on the same night in Dublin, a Japanese student with a fully completed permit, but in their luggage, was refused entry and held in custody for four days. Maybe a few ancestral spirits had removed the ‘barriers’ for my return ‘home’.

Leaf 3 “Words and Pictures” Elphin Road Launceston 1965 or early 1966

Two memories battle for a precise location in my early history. One is where I’m aged about six, checking letterboxes because I have conflated the sending out of pamphlets about the introduction of decimal currency with the idea that actual money was being delivered.  I have a strong impression that the struggle to find money was a constant part of my mother’s waking hours. My venture into postal theft reaped poor dividends as the Government simply sent out cards showing the likeness of the coins and banknotes to come. The second memory is heading to the newsagent to buy a copy of Smash, a British comic, with a penny or ha’penny with a coin that may have been given to me by an old man who lived in the same group of flats as our family.  Maybe this was the old man who taught me draughts and a few basic card games.  

The struggle to read the borrowed Dick and Jane books from East Launceston Primary School still lingers with me today, especially the frantic efforts I made to avoid the terror of trying to read aloud in class before my stuttering and mangled pronunciation ended in tears.  Yet those struggles and terror quickly disappeared with my private and mental devouring of the pictures, actions and words of Smash comics. Comics remain a treasured part of my reading material, and like Clive James in Unreliable Memoirs, some of them rank equally to Arundhati Roy, Kerouac or Shakespeare. As I type this, the latest 5 issues of The Phantom are sitting on the table waiting to be read with sweet pleasure and anticipation. Comics taught me I could master words and language, even if I had little talent or capacity to show that mastery with my voice.

When I first started writing these vignettes I would visualise a scene or recall a photograph and then develop the story around the image.  Image - my mother and I in our best outfits on the steps of a public building and the camera catching her beauty. Another image – a late Friday night almost two decades later and I am in the backseat of a speeding car, packed with local youth, as beer cans are being hurled at a pursuing police car.
For several years I have urged law book publishers to add colour and images to their text books or to produce a “Rough Guide” series to the law where cases and principles are supplemented by the back story, pictures and other information in drop boxes and other devices. Many of my academic colleagues would almost sneer at the ‘dumbing down’ of the delivery of ‘the law’ in this way.  For me, it is making the law accessible and interesting. A few years ago Lynden Griggs, my colleague at UTAS, and I wrote an article advocating teaching property law using just six cases. The idea was that we would trace the story, including the legal and the social aspects, from the beginning to the aftermath of the case. The idea was that this ‘six pack” of cases could put law cases and principles not only in their context, but also make them come alive with their characters, dramas and intriguing stories of hope, despair and chaos. This method would provide a way to immerse students in the detail of the law as well as into the drama and struggle behind the dry cases set out in the textbooks and case law. 

Leaf 4 “Freedom Fighter” Cape Town July 1999

The words “Freedom Fighter…”  were splashed across a large picture of me in the Argus newspaper in Cape Town, South Africa: an honour in the land of Nelson Mandela and the inspiring jurist Albie Sachs.  I was halfway through a rapid 3 day trip (including return travel that started with a lecture in Introduction to Law in Hobart on a Wednesday morning - a hurried filming in my office of a Lateline segment on FOI (that never went to air), a taxi to Hobart International Airport, a series of flights, – Melbourne - Kuala Lumpur –Mauritius – Johannesburg  - Cape Town, 48 hours at a conference then a return set of flights – Cape Town - Johannesburg – Sydney – Hobart, followed by another Introduction to Law lecture on the Monday morning, just to give a presentation to a conference about FOI in South Africa.  When I asked an organisier for the South African Human Rights Commission why I was there, he simply said, “after what you have to say about the experience elsewhere and what best practice is in relation to cabinet information then our proposals will look moderate.” Deep in the text of the Argus article is possibly the only use by an academic in a media interview using the term “ratshit”.

Three very different encounters have stayed in my mind from that trip. The first was being confronted by the slums on the way from the airport in Cape Town. It was my first near but still fleeting and remote encounter with mass poverty. It was intriguing to see the range of housing even within the slums. In one location, a large two storey concrete building lorded it over the rest of the buildings. Stretching out in almost prefect concentric, regulated zones were different types of housing: nearest to the two storey building were those constructed of better tin; as the zones went out the tin quality dropped quickly; and finally, tin was soon replaced by cardboard. On the edges of stagnant water pools (large puddles) were the most improvised dwellings. It seemed that poverty clearly had its own levels.  The second encounter occurred at a reception during a conversation with a white male who was a former member of the South African Defence Forces.  He was telling a story from the apartheid years about Armoured Personnel Carriers and the ANC. Another person, a black female left the group at the same time as I did.  She made a phone call where she related the man’s story and seemed to be urging some kind of action or response from the person on the other end of the line. Whilst the gathering was multi-racial, it was clear the scars, wounds and enmities from an earlier period were not buried, instead, they still lingered just under the surface of collective memory.

The final encounter was a lesson in the difference between necessary accommodation at work and separate lives after hours. A very mixed group from the conference, in terms of race, gender and countries went to an elegant wharf side restaurant. As we walked in, the conversation slowed to a stop. The absence of non-white faces among the diners was a stark contrast to our multi-ethnic group. During the course of our meal several ‘coloured’ passers-by stopped and looked into the restaurant. A couple appeared to make a spur of the moment decision and came in for a meal. One of my companions remarked the next day that there were very distinct worlds for most South Africans, nearly uncrossable divisions between their multi-racial working lives and their very race-centered non-work existence.

Leaf 5 “An inferno on the edge of town” Whyalla, South Australia  December 1977 – February 1978

A magnificent sight, driving on the edge of the South Australian desert with Dad at the wheel. Great forks of lightening rippled towards the earth from all locations around a perfectly flat horizon.  I felt like I was at the epicentre. Every few seconds another series of dazzling bright streaks, a fresh lightening bolt would appear, often before the previous one had faded. The blue sky disappearing into night wore a blanket of dark cloud and the flashes highlighted the redness of the soil. I was on my summer holidays before starting my second year of University. We were driving towards a complex of steel and iron rising out of the landscape: BHP’s Whyalla Steel Mill

Dad had moved to work at Whyalla after being retrenched in the massive lay offs of over 700 workers, almost half the workforce, at Mt Lyell, Tasmania in 1976. The retrenchments ripped apart Queenstown, a small isolated town of about 8,000 people. Many families were forced to do the unthinkable and leave town, an unimaginable moment for many in that town, including for my family. Untill that moment, an attitude had prevailed that the history of Queenstown, despite all the experiences of mining towns everywhere else, would be eternal. I had completed a social sciences assignment in matriculation college in 1975 which attempted to explain this attitude based on the evidence of surviving the economic crunch of the 1890s, the Mt Lyell Disaster of 1912, two World Wars, the Depression and hard times in the early 1960s. There was a feeling and an optimism that the town would be there for centuries.

At the same time as the retrenchments, two retiring Directors of Consolidated Goldfields, the then owners of Mt Lyell, received golden parachutes of several hundred thousand dollars each. The events of the Whitlam Dismissal, the invasion of East Timor, the Mt Lyell retrenchments and the golden parachute for the directors added sharp dimensions to my thinking and attitudes. The lonesome outsider started to form a critical and sharp political view of the world.  The accidental discovery of Bob Dylan (I was attracted by the cover and the poetic liner notes) via his Desire album and Bruce Springsteen’s tributes to the working/struggling classes of small towns finished the forging of a radical edge to my politics and social views.
After a long period of trying to find work with hundreds of others on the West Coast, even trying for jobs on Groote Eylandt, the largest island in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Dad eventually scored a job at Whyalla in South Australia and the family pulled up its roots and went with him. For a family that considered a once a year trip to Burnie (100 miles) as a major and largely joyless adventure, this appeared like a journey of no return. I stayed behind in Tasmania to continue my first year at the University.

Whilst my TESS (Tertiary Education Student Support) allowance was minimal (calculated on Dad’s previous wage at Mt Lyell and not on his unemployment benefit or much lower new wage), it did entitle me to 3 return trips to my home (the definition of home  now incorporated my family’s new home in South Australia) each year. No more money could be found for me to live on but I could spend more than double my monthly TESS cheque on each trip home three times a year if I wanted.

Bored and keen for money, during my first summer in Whyalla, I rocked up to the employment office at the steel mill. I lied about my educational background claiming that I had just finished college and had no intent of going on to university. My long hair and shaggy beard seemed to do little to undermine the creditability of my story. I was hired. Thus began my short but intense career as a shift-work mill labourer in the hot desert sun. There were a number of Tasmanian employment refugees like my father at the mill. We identified ourselves by drawing a rough triangle (the general shape of the island state of Tasmania) on our helmets with the year of our arrival in the middle of the triangle. My red helmet had a yellow triangle and a ‘77’.
 The main, and never ending, shift task was using a special metal ‘key’, a metal rod about a metre in length with a ‘V’ at one end. The labourer would approach a 6 metre long steel girder laying on its side push the ‘V’ at the top of the bar into an edge of the girder and with the right degree of force and timing ‘flick’ the bar over. It was a simple task that anyone could do and the degree of instruction matched its complexity – a handful of minutes on the first day. But it was, in fact, a simple task that sometimes went horribly wrong. Errors in estimating the force, timing and/or getting the flick wrong would result in the 6 metre several tonne  girder whipping back suddenly. When this happened you had to do two things: first, let go of the bar – or have your arm wrenched from its socket; and second, step back, duck and dive backwards as your bar spun would often spin back towards you. The turning procedure needed to be done every few minutes. If you failed to turn a girder the whole section of the rolling mill would be on hold until you recovered your turning bar, tested your arm and successfully flipped the girder.

There were three shifts, morning from 8am - 4pm, afternoon from 4pm - midnight and night shift from midnight - 8am. You rotated through these shifts over three weeks. Labourers, desperate for money like me, could also volunteer for overtime.  Sometimes, overtime was an extra three hour shift or a rare but enriching double shift with full meal allowances. The only drawback of overtime was having to rock up at the start of the next normal shift – a killer after a double shift. For a very good reason there were few volunteers for overtime.– the overtime job that awaited you. Few people volunteered for a second lot of overtime. After eight hours of flicking steel girders, with little access to water, your stamina and concentration was fairly low.  The overtime job was ‘bundling’.  Bundling is such a simple phrase that described something Dante would have struggled to depict. Girders would emerge from the furnaces glowing red hot, twisted and warped. They needed to be straightened between massive heavy-duty rollers. After the rolling, the girders would be collected in bundles of 8-10 by massive forklifts and taken out into the desert to cool off. The cooling took several days. The cooled girders were then returned to the rollers to be further straightened.

Bundling required the labourer to twist a thick wire around both ends of the bundle and a third wire in the middle. Donning a full face mask, thick leather gloves and a thick leather apron with your trusty flip bar in one hand and the wire in the other you dashed from the shelter towards this massive pile of glowing red steel with two other work mates. There you stood like a leather clad medieval knight on the edge of a dessert in the middle of summer to undergo your ordeal.  Step 1, twist the long wire in half forming a small loop at one end. Step 2, tap the new double strand wire one third along and about halfway along which allowed the wire to be folded at these ‘joints’. Step 3 walk quickly up to the mass of steel, surrounded by heat, burning dust, choking air and slide the wire underneath and up behind the bundle. Step 4,  reach across the red hot steel – avoiding contact - insert bar in loop twist until wire is super tight. Step 5, ignore the honking forklift drivers right behind you (on a bonus for each bundle collected – whilst the bundlers were on a flat minimum wage).

Five quick steps.  25 seconds in total if done flawlessly.  My maximum limit was about 40 seconds of exposure to the heat, choking fumes and horn blasts. Stuff up the bundling and the second attempt would generally take another 40 -50 seconds. Third attempts were simply suicidal. On second attempts you started to forget things like why there needed to be a loop, you would neglect to put in the ‘joints’ and struggle with trying to fit a straight thick iron wire around a stack of red hot steel. This was often followed by the ultimate moment of induced forgetfulness. Thick leather offered some protection from heat but it was not a very fireproof barrier against direct contact with red hot steel. A quick lapse of concentration would be immediately accompanied by the smell of fresh burning and the necessity to quickly retreat. I never got burnt but several times I exchanged my smoking holey gloves or apron for new ones. Once the girders were bundled, you retreated to the shelter taking off helmet, gloves and knocking back endless quantities of water. If the bundling was completed in the first attempt and in minimal time you had the luxury of fresh air, water and time to refocus on the next foray. When you staggered through a second or third attempt you had no time for any recovery.  Labourers who failed to complete overtime tasks never got a second opportunity.

Stand stills were frequent at the mill. Rolling the warped red hot steel between the straightening wheels required attention to speed, the weight to be applied and the positioning of the girder. The rolling operators seemed to be a hot-bed collection of dope smoking and white horse riding (heroin) cowboys and inattention and therefore hold ups were common. During the day and early afternoon shifts when these stoppages occurred,  labourers, like me, had to grab tins of yellow paint and  repaint all the safety rails, just in case a ‘boss’ was walking around. ‘Bosses’ had to suffer big pieces of machinery not working but would not tolerate a free loading labourer. Over several weeks, I painted the same safety railings at least 15 times. When stoppages occurred after the afternoon shift  meal beak (7.30pm) or on nightshift, when no Bosses were on the job,  you could curl up in a corner and try and sleep or read under the lights. Generally I was the only reader in the rolling mill area. Reading Kerouac, Salinger, Tom Robbins or political philosophy in the strange twilight and backdrop of a night time steel mill on the edge of the desert added a special atmosphere to the task.
A few weeks of enduring an antipodean version of Dante’s Inferno led to the fateful decision to forgo a few extra weeks of wages and head back to Tasmania to enrol in a special 2 week intensive Introduction to Law course. A series of letters exchanged with my friend Sally (met in my very first Political Science tutorial and my first ever private school friend) persuaded me to give law a go. At that point I had no realisation of the role played by law in creating and preserving the status quo that I had started to rub against.

Leaf 6 “Talking to the Generals” Phnom Penh, Cambodia August 2007

We had just driven across Phnom Penh in a small convoy, small flags fluttering at the front of the vehicle.  Negotiations for this meeting had been going on for a couple of days. We were waved into the Headquarters of the Cambodian Defence Ministry. Car doors were opened smoothly by officers in smart dress uniforms. On the circular creamy marble stairs at each turn, there were pairs of silent and still guards. As we climbed the levels, the amount of insignia, colour cords and braiding on the statute like guards increased. The seven of us (including our interpreter, four Ministry of National Assembly officials and my Cambodian off-sider) were ushered into a massive room.  We were seated at two long polished wooden tables separated by a wide gap in the middle. At each seat was a microphone. It was like a photo from the Paris Peace Talks of the late 1960s or early 1970s. Opposite sat eight men in full dress uniform, adorned with medals and overflowing braid, and one lone civilian. Behind each officer, and a few paces back, fully armed sentries stood at attention. I wanted to whip out my camera to catch the scene but decided that this would probably be a deal breaker.

At one point in the meeting, I referred to a section in the Cambodian Constitution. The translation was followed by looks of concern and the hands of the Generals started to move towards their jackets. My immediate thought was that I had derailed the talks with a stupid comment. It was both a relief and surprise when all of them drew out their pocket constitutions to confirm the accuracy of my Cambodian constitutional knowledge. At that point, I reflected that reaching for their constitutions rather than their guns may have been a sign of progress in Cambodia’s long and very troubled history. 
Later, in the course of a few terse exchanges, it was apparent that the Generals were deeply concerned, but it was hard to fathom the cause.  Then, enlightenment: the Generals thought the ‘right to information’ was also the ‘right of every soldier’, regardless of rank,  to release information. They had been reeling from the thought of Cambodian privates exercising constitutionally guaranteed rights to hand out information to anyone who wanted it. A quick clarification that FOI officers, authorisied to make decisions about release of information, ought to be senior officers operating in a firm line of command placed negotiations back on a smooth path.

As we left the compound I reflected on how a shy, tongue-tied boy from a small mountain mining town had found himself dealing directly with generals and Ministers in a far away land (Eespecially after a childhood of imagining being a solider in Vietnam). Yet the stories of those I worked with and my visit to S21 quickly evaporated any sentimentality or light heartedness. S21 was the former school where over 14,000 Cambodians and a handful of non-Cambodians were systematically tortured, interrogated, photographed (often in their torture chair) and then killed, Most of the people I worked with had been young children or young adults during the Khmer years.

Throughout my work in Cambodia there would be times when these 40-55 year old survivors would gently recall some aspect of these troubled years. It might be a comment about how my local 45 year old consultant was the family ‘elder’ for his extended family.  Or the NGO activist, who acted as a go-between with government officials, recounting how as a young teenager he walked across Cambodia, eluding the Khmer Rouge and then swum underwater sucking through a reed to get across the Thai border before becoming for a period a teenage gunrunner. 

Next -

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Memoir - 1st story Mexico 2008


The first of the pieces from my memoir project. For a backgrounder on this project see earlier post 
  
 The Memoir - a work in progress

Background see Working on a Memoir
Leaves 2-6 Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia
Leaves 7-9 Hooning, Teaching & Presenting
Leaves 10-11 Bookseller, Vexatious FOI applicants and shaky start to an academic career
Leaves 12-14 Car crash, Launceston early 1960s, A Road Not Taken
 At the moment the memoir consists of a series of leaves or postcards that slip between time periods without following a chronology or trying to tell a structured story.
 Appreciate feedback, reactions and suggestions.

Cover art: with kind permission of Rachel-Ireland-Meyers (see http://www.redbubble.com/people/grace4)
 Blue Echo

Leaves of My Past – Snapshots from an unfinished journey
Leaf 1 “Happy Birthday” November 2008 Mexico
It’s an early November evening and I’m walking down a colonial cobblestone street towards our hotel in Puebla, Mexico. The Camino Real is a grand 16th century building converted from a monastery where the bodies of nuns, many rumoured to be pregnant, are in the walls.  The building has a large open air courtyard ideal for recreating a scene where Zorro would be ducking from second storey stone archway to archway dodging sword thrusts and bullets fired from the courtyard below. On the eve of my 50th birthday, I am a hemisphere, ocean and continent away from home, wife, children, and seemingly, several worlds away from my birth in a small coal mining village nestled in the hills of the east coast of Tasmania. I am in Mexico as an invited guest of two warring factions involved in Freedom of Information and Freedom of Expression. Though unsure of the causes or history of the rift, I can sense the deep animosity between the two groups and the problems caused by my close and personal links to key people in both groups. In the luxurious foyer of the Mexico City Sheraton, my first host, a Mexican City Information Commissioner, hands me over to the representative (a future postgrad student of mine) of her sworn enemy. Like a scene from a black and white cold war movie, I am made to walk from one to the other in a silent handover between antagonists. The Commissioner is a beautiful, feisty, flamboyant, long haired woman who seems to have high level contacts everywhere. She is cool, urbane and bejewelled. My future postgrad carries with her the revolutionary spirit and proud gait of Pancho Villas.
I am in Mexico as part of a travelling troupe of speakers from Canada, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Spain and Mexico. In return for our expenses, we are required to speak at a  number of  conferences and events in Mexico City, Puebla and Cuernavaca. At each town, we roll from our small min-bus, set up camp at a new hotel and then wait to be told where and when we are performing our freedom of expression show-pieces. In sharp contrast to the much smaller and more subdued gatherings I encounter in many counties including my own, the audiences often number several hundred passionate and interested people. 
As we navigate, through Puebla, on time worn cobblestones, I start to relate my story to the Spanish academic alongside me. Rumours at breakfast  suggest she is an Opus Dei associate.  Yet against the backdrop of the volcanoes Popocatépetl and Iztaccíhuat, it is more the catholic grace of her smile that draws me into conversation rather than the form or depths of her beliefs.  My story is one I never wanted to tell before but now it seems eager for airing, even if only as a collection of poorly recalled fragments. Maybe I am prompted by the pending milestone of my 50th birthday or maybe it is the surrounding and deep layers of Aztec, Spanish and Mexican history that encourages me to approach my own heritage.  In this gathering of foreigners – to Mexico and each other – maybe I feel safe to hesitantly retrace experiences and stories I had thought long dismissed from my life.
 
My story begins with a young and beautiful woman with flaming red hair. She is holding the hand of a small boy on the steps of the Launceston post office in the early 1960s. In photos and my earliest memories, she could have easily graced the salons of Paris or the Bohemian bookstores of 1950’s San Francisco but it was her fate (and maybe my birth), which restricted her to a much shorter journey from the back blocks of Elizabeth Town to the socially constrained streets of early 1960’s Launceston. In that era of Tasmania’s history, she was out of place: a young woman with two young children and no husband. The missing husband, my birth father, was someone I only encountered in limited ways. This stranger’s name appears on my original birth certificate. My middle name is his but I have rarely drawn attention to it. The first seven years of my life are bookmarked by a surname I no longer wear or identify with and one I freely surrendered at first opportunity. The replacement of the name also seemed to close the door on my early years. 
As the memories faded, I made no attempt to hold on or to test my mother’s silence on the past.  My birth father has remained a stranger who appears in a couple of black and white photos in my mother’s old tin box. My only other encounter with this man was a couple of years previously, date forgotten, when reading the death notices in The Mercury, a newspaper often flimsy and unsatisfying in its content but accurate in its lucrative death announcements. I had cut the notice out, intrigued by the mention of other children, and other unknown family members but that clipping was quickly neglected and is now lost. The rough landmarks I have in my memory would place my parent’s breakup around the early months of my little sister’s life when I was 3 or 4 years old.
No questions were asked about this stranger because my mother never seemed to want to talk. For many years I didn’t realise he was missing. When I was around eight years of age my mother met the only man I have ever called dad, and whose surname I embraced eagerly and still wear with pride. For many years I didn’t feel fully entitled or worthy to wear the name. Only as my reputation as an academic, teacher and law reformer grew, did I feel I had repaid a very large gift.
In the 1960s, ‘broken families’ were not uncommon but were treated as failures and rarely spoken of and then, only in whispers. In contrast, when my own children were in school, Esther and I belonged to a minority of married couples still in their first marriage and or family grouping. I bore my background as a secret, although well known by everyone in our small town, whereas my children knew automatically which week or day their friends would shift from one family setting to their alternative, and even at times their third or fourth alternative household.
My broken story, teased out by some gentle questioning and encouragement, only took a few blocks to tell.  It was like opening my own old photo tin but my pictures were more fragmentary and less complete, than my mother’s. They were like old deteriorating film off cuts, without a narrator or scriptwriter to provide the storyline. 
As I listened to my companion talk about her recent travels across Europe, facts, impressions, glimpses and other half recalled scenes of my past floated like bubbles struggling to the surface of a thick and opaque liquid. In one scene, I am looking after my young sister, who was less than 4, while my mother worked in a low paid job in some nearby factory. The other fragments are of constantly moving between houses, cities, towns and states so that no place ever anchored itself as ‘my home’. Within these scenes, are encounters in different places with a set of relatives and friends who seemed as unsettled and transient as we were. We constituted a group of people descended from the wandering and drifting poor, who James Boyce writes about near the end of his Van Diemen’s Land. These early arrivals were men and women (and children)  forced to the periphery of both the landscape and society of Tasmania in the late 1840s and 1850s. By the 1960s, their descendants were still poor and drifting. We remained locked into an educational, economic and social periphery, living in small towns, the poorer streets of Launceston or on a circuit between friends and relatives, employed as labourers or semi-skilled workers in forestry, farming and mining while supplementing periods of unemployment with roo and possum shooting. I remember looking at the missing fingers, and finger joints, of an older relative who seemed to have fortuitous workplace accidents when drinking funds started to dry up. It took a long while for my interpretation of his ‘accidents’ to change from a tale of besting the system to one of hopelessness.
That brief period of openness in a warm Mexican evening started to release over time other stories. In particular, I recalled stories of walking to and from different primary schools, constantly alone, conjuring up mythical visions of my past and connections.  In those long walks, a remoteness and a stubborn self reliance was forged that still erodes at all my bonds. The photographs of this period show a serious young boy, not unhappy, but wary, alert – taking all around him in, just in case it is whisked away.
As we approached The Camino Real, the ghosts of entombed pregnant nuns and the darkness of the night  filled the colonial streets. In that darkness, and surrounded by the thick walls, I hid my story away again surprised by what I had brought out to share with this stranger in the early evening light of this beautiful but foreign country.
 My story stopped before getting to the little boy with a severe speech impediment, an impediment that added a deeper and more complicated layer to his feeling of being an outsider. It’s an impediment, that still lingers in the background and determines many of the things I do. The King’s Speech reminded me of the lingering sensitivity, indeed the rawness of this legacy. Now in late middle age, or early old age, I struggle  to stretch my vocabulary to new areas or multi-syllable words and I am unwilling to try to learn new languages. The stuttering and word mangling were compounded by a tendency, still a feature, of speaking at a million miles an hour when excited or engaged. A constant wonder for me is how a stuttering, syllable stumbling motor mouth has forged a career and reputation that relies heavily on public communication. Maybe my art of keeping things concise and simple – to accommodate my own limitations – has reaped unexpected benefits.
The unreliable tongue and voice led the young boy, with no books at home, to endless hours sitting in the small school library devouring every book from non-fiction series on World War II battleships to an entire twenty-five plus collection of books about a wandering young cowboy with his trusty palomino who signed off every story with ‘hasta la vista’. Hours spent in isolation where my tongue could not betray me and the magic of word combinations seemed achievable via the written word.  Its a legacy that dogged my every step through high school even to the leaver’s dinner, where I arrived full of dreams and bravado dressed in a purple flared suit, floral shirt and tie brought during a rare family trip to Burnie, in those days and in my family’s eyes a distant 113 miles away.  On the tables at the Leavers Dinner were nameplates and a caricature for each person drawn by a talented and perceptive classmate. Despite being a House Captain, school representative in cricket, basketball, badminton, athletics, proud under age drinker and feared fast bowler, my image was a picture of a cute bookworm with glasses. Forty years later I can appreciate the foresight and accuracy of that drawing, but throughout that special night and for many years later, I felt it was a denial of a large part of who I was. Books were constant and close companions but there were other stories, other parts of what was or who was ‘me’.  In a mining town, the translation was simple – being into books was simply ‘weird’ and undermined your creditability. Only the pace of my cricket deliveries and my drinking capacity rescued me from being treated as a total pariah.

to be continued  - Leaf 2 “Returning to Erin” Ireland April 1999

Leaves 2-6 -  Ireland, Launceston, Cape Town, Whyalla, Cambodia